Applications submitted in response to this RFA must include the following information in line with ATI Objectives via the application form:
- Project Description:
The applicant must provide a detailed description of the project, specifying its goal, activities, and results. These should be in line with the overall objective of the grant. Sections should be structured as follows: detailed description of purpose/summary, background, project goals, detailed description of anticipated activities/outcomes.
- Monitoring (Results and Benchmarks):
ATI will work closely with the grantee to define appropriate indicators for the overall interventions based on applicable ME&L indicators as identified by ATI and the USAID stakeholders. ATI will work with the grantee to develop the ME&L plan at the kickoff, edit as needed during implementation (e.g., if additional transactions are added), and will collect and review data from the grantee for requisite reporting to USAID throughout the life of the activity. The grantee will be required to reasonably maintain and report on relevant data as part of the periodic check-in process. ATI will conduct data quality assessments, as necessary. In many cases, the grantee must be willing to share results for at least a six-month period following the completion of their grant in order for ATI and USAID to accurately capture results (e.g., an investment that closes after the period of performance but was facilitated during the contracted support).
The applicant should define, to the maximum extent possible at the application stage, results, and benchmarks for monitoring the performance towards attainment of program objectives. Please explain how your organization will monitor the implementation and performance of the project and indicate one or more indicators per activity that will be used to assess the progress and performance of the project, and the achievement of the expected results.
Upon selection and award, ATI will work closely with the awardee to determine the agreement structure including final timelines, deliverables, and associated costs. Additionally, ATI and USAID will also work closely with the awardee on the overall learning agenda, including the appropriate cadence for reporting, communications, and other general ongoing project management activities, as well as be a resource to help the awardee achieve overall objectives.
- Sustainability: The applicant should describe how the project, or its benefits, will continue after grant funding ends. What measures are being put in place to ensure sustainability?
- Organizational Capability: The application shall include information that demonstrates the applicant's expertise and ability to meet or exceed the goals of this program.
Organizational capacity should include information on sound management systems, with regards to financial, administration, internal policies and procedures and controls that safeguard against fraud, abuse, and waste.
- Personnel. The applicant should propose up to three key personnel and give a description of their roles and responsibilities. Each applicant demonstrates the key personnel’s ability to perform the duties outlined in the program description/statement of work and in accordance with the applicant’s approach. ATI will evaluate the CV to determine the individual’s knowledge, skills and abilities. Key personnel are those critical of implementation only and do not include administrative or support staff.
- Past Performance: Applicants must present evidence of their experience in undertaking similar activities. Applicants may include descriptions of two (projects or other similar activities). ATI will request references that should include clients’ names and telephone numbers.
- Budget: All applications must include a completed budget in United States dollars.
- Milestones: the application must contain a table with milestones that the applicant and ATI will track during the implementation of this program. The applicant must propose those milestones, means of verification, due dates, and amount per milestone. The partner will be paid an agreed amount upon completion of each milestone.
The applications will be evaluated according to the evaluation criteria set forth below. To the extent necessary (if the award is not made based on initial applications), negotiations may be conducted with each applicant whose application, after discussion and negotiation, has a reasonable chance of being selected for an award. Award will be made to the responsible applicant whose application offers the best value.
The applications will be evaluated on: -
- The geographic and sector coverage of the proposed solution.
- Increased number of full-time jobs created, particularly for women and youth.
- Increased number of small-holder farmers engaged and connected to market.
- Value of domestic sales and/or exports (regional/international)
- Demonstrated co-investment by the applicant.
Award will be made based on the ranking of applications by the review panel according to the evaluation criteria and scoring system identified below:
Criteria
|
% Allocation
|
Suitability of the proposed technical approach
|
35%
|
Project management and organisational capacity
|
25%
|
Past performance
|
15%
|
Potential for sustainability of proposed initiatives
|
15%
|
Cost consciousness
|
10%
|